restricted TED talks? ...What's all this then?
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |
Re: restricted TED talks? Woaah interesting ..
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |
Re: restricted TED talks?
Hi dude, can you share a link to that Oliver's talk? (i don't know him) I'm just beggining to look at Hancock's talk, but, what is more important i think, if this guys are trying to do research (experiments) to prove something, that is doing science, i mean, they are not pulling data out of air, one can argue that theirs experiments are flawed, bad interpreted, or whatever (and probably it is), but that's another matter? And afaik if they are doing that (research) one couldn't call them out saying it what they are doing is pseudoscience? at worst they are bad scientist. (correct me if i'm wrong) And it seems for what i read this dude (Sheldrake) is open to another scientist to "work" together or try to replicate his findings and see what is going on .. For example taked from the link above i posted here, he says: "The TED Scientific Board refers to ”attempts by other scientists eager to replicate the work” on morphic resonance. I would be happy to work with these eager scientists if the Scientific Board can reveal who they are." In the google talk i posted in mainstream watch he talks about that too, and share experience where other scientist ignore him when he invites them to try to do the same experiment and see if they both get similar results. So, seeing a people doing that, even if he is wrong, it clicks to me, at least the dude is trying to find the truth out of something, that is science. Anyways, it always suprise me how afraid people are to recognize that they could be wrong about something, do you ever see someone in a "public discussion" where they have very opposite points of view say "wow, you are right dude, i was wrong!"? Like it seems they are not interested in the first place to find out the truth, only protect their own opinions and belief systems. Because you know, being wrong/making mistakes = BAD BAD BAD, avoid at all cost. I want to say to them "Dudes! we just want the f***** truth of what going on!, whatever it's, not what we like it to be, when the truth is lost, everyone lose" It's sad, very sad. Theorically that board are scientist? because i have my doubts that they are in the first place =) And if they are public, that could open the windows to "open debate" and that ... could be something .. scary. Maybe this is just predictble to happen between "rear loaders" scientist and front ones? LOL =) |
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |
Re: restricted TED talks? Hi dude,
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |
Re: restricted TED talks? Thanks for the link Alex! There was much truth in this talk. I can certainly see why this would be not accepted by the mainstream leaning TEDx organization and why there was so much controversy.
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |
Re: restricted TED talks? Hi dudes,
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting |