English (United Kingdom)French (Fr)Russian (CIS)Espa
Home Forum Neurohacking The Lab Relationship between network functions

Connexion

Pour acc

Leftblank
useravatar
User Info

Relationship between network functions

Hello all,

since I read ICMM back in 2007, I became fascinated with how the top networks build on top of the bottom ones, so we can train the latter and actually improve the former.

But there is a shadow of doubt in me. I want to make it crystal clear, because it seems more important to me than everything else in NH.

I am a computer programmer. Day by day I move lines of text back and forth, rename things, type ;'s and &'s and stuff. This is a purely abstract activity (although I type a lot with ten fingers). Probably for the most part it's N5.

But I want to do things in the right order, so it will be easier for me to do programming stuff if I could improve my N2 and N4.

The question: is it possible to become a better programmer by learning to play guitar? Should the N4 activities, for example, be inherent to the N5 activity I want to augment, or can they be of any kind, only the N4 ones?


Administrator has disabled public posting
Meta Process
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Hey, left,

From my understanding of the theory, the answers to your questions are yes, no, yes, although if the goal of improving as a programmer is important in itself to you, there may be activities better suited for that on account of their closer relationship to the kind of mental processes used in programming.

That aside, if you're anything like me, playing a musical instrument is an intense pleasure not many other activities can give us, an important factor for motivation and well-being that in the long run may prove to be more beneficial to your goal than a hobby or exercise chosen for pragmatic reasons only.


Administrator has disabled public posting
Sakiro
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

i was thinking the same thing about programming =)

Because i always wanted to learn to program (at least at some basic level), and if at the same time can i train a network great too.

Well, here the doubts arise:

I'm not a programmer, so i'm not sure, but i always see it like a high logical skill/task, so i thought that is a very heavy N5 skill.

But in another thread alex mentioned that probably is more related to n4 than n5 ... probably because you are "creating" something? Maybe trains both ..

Anyways, maybe if someone is learning programming without "thinking for himself" i mean just coding, is not the same like an enginner that probably is using more his imagination/creative skills to design something?

I mean i'm not sure of this but maybe some programmer do his stuff too much from "memory" ..

So well, i have the same question than you =)

Improving your working memory can help too, because you could "update faster", take more data/code in your mind and manipulate it etc, but you know the golden rules of course hehe

I think is in interesting topic, i remember reading in some place a debate about it, if it's better just put more hours in the practise in the skills you want to improve (in this case, just program more, read more related books etc) or in some related skill that support it or can make some "transfer" .. like you asked about n2-n4 ..

Hope it makes sense.

Cheers!


Administrator has disabled public posting
Leftblank
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Meta,

thanks for your reply; programming is not important in itself for me, but since it's the subject I understand most, I mentioned it as an example of a more general principle: that unrelated tasks in different networks could influence each other. It would be absolutely fascinating if they could, but from my observations I couldn't conclude anything.

But! Since I started to understand the mechanics of playing guitar a little, I opened a whole lot of ways of looking at learning.

For example, the brilliant book "Principles of correct practice for the guitar" taught me how to form new skills! And I am 21 years old. It seems like the first time I "really" understood this process.
It says basically: when you want to perform a particular passage or a movement, you must absolutely relax everything not related to the movement, then perform it extremely slowly for a couple of dozens times, and then you can increase speed, because muscles "know" what they must be doing. If you mix the movement with tensions in other muscles, they get incorporated into the movement as well, and you end up tensing these muscles every time you perform it.

So this book opened to me the golden rule "Cells that fire together, wire together", and I must thank the Author and the Guitar for that.


Administrator has disabled public posting
Meta Process
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Ah, serendipity... smile


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

leftblank wrote
since I read ICMM back in 2007, I became fascinated with how the top networks build on top of the bottom ones, so we can train the latter and actually improve the former.

Sorry to be so late replying. ICMM is well out of date, and I didn't know the details back then. Now it's apparent that working on certain skills can improve both abstract and concrete abilities at the same time because the brain uses them same networks for both types of task. It works for the same reasons that imagining yourself working out improves actual physical performance AND imagination -the brain's using the same nets for imagining doing stuff as it uses for physically doing stuff, so the same network's getting extra exercise. There's more info about this in the updated tutorial 6, and hopefully more coming.

If you grab the list of animal behaviors (concrete skills) from the library and see what abstract skills you can associate with what concrete skills, you'll know what you can do to rear nets to improve front nets, and vice versa. Simple behaviors in N2 improve both N2 AND complex procedural thinking in N4, and so on, so hunting moose really will improve your ability to detect program bugs and spot priorities, and tidying your office really will help you organize your ideas. I'll get around to making up a chart as soon as I catch up with this moose.  :  )

All nets depend on those that came before because their functions depend on previous abilities -you can't begin the task of perception or put anything into memory (N3) if you can't pay attention to anything(N1) or be motivated and able to explore it(N2) in the first place. We can't respond effectively or interact with things we fail to notice; this must be obvious. So doing things in the right order means getting your rear nets' abilities up and running before trying to develop front end abilities that rely on them.

Inevitably the work you do on the back end will have already improved some front functions before you get there, and the feedback from beneficial tasks that the front end does every day will also have helped further improve rear nets. That's the idea in NH -setting up loops of beneficial feedback, then the system gets back to it's originally-intended automatic habit of self improvement.


I am a computer programmer. Day by day I move lines of text back and forth, rename things, type ;'s and &'s and stuff. This is a purely abstract activity (although I type a lot with ten fingers). Probably for the most part it's N5.

This depends on what you're doing mentally. If you're programming (being creative, assembling, putting stuff together, synthesis) it's mainly N4. If it's data entry, factual text or excel sheets (assessing, administration, taking stuff apart, analysis) it's mainly N5. When you're coding it's gonna be some of both.


The question: is it possible to become a better programmer by learning to play guitar? Should the N4 activities, for example, be inherent to the N5 activity I want to augment, or can they be of any kind, only the N4 ones?

Yes to the first part. Playing guitar (or any instrument) improves the connections between all networks and so improves overall performance as well as parts of each net.
I hope the notes above have already helped with the second part. If not, tell me what info is missing.

I'll catch up with other posts here asap,
Best,
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Meta wrote
playing a musical instrument is an intense pleasure

Extremely good point! Part of the reason playing music is so growth-inducing is that it produces neurochemicals that reduce anxiety.
Party on dudes  :  )
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Sakiro,
Hopefully my previous post has answered some of your questions. Obviously there are a lot of different, more- or less-creative approaches to programming, as you pointed out.

Re: improving skills: check out timed repetition interspersed with a variety of different tasks (eg, practice programming for a couple of hours, then watch a comedy show and eat, then return to programming an hour later. Leave longer gaps between repetitions as time goes by. A variety of different activities, some outdoors, fill in the gaps, including of course sleeping.

Remember that stuff we read is not always backed up by evidence, so make sure you know where your info is coming from. It is true that many hours of practice are required to broaden a neural pathway and make a skill automatic, but its also true that regular breaks, good food,  natural sleep, input control and anxiety reduction will speed the learning process up a lot.

Reading lots of books will help most in the first stage of learning. If you are familiar with the learning process you can work with it at every stage.
Best,
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: Relationship between network functions

Leftblank wrote
this book opened to me the golden rule "Cells that fire together, wire together",


Experience is 'walking the path' and this is how we really 'get it'. Leftblank's author obviously knows their stuff about sensorimotor memory, and you probably all know that in buiding up accurate muscular responses, we are at the same time building up the supporting networks in the brain. Accuracy is always more important than speed, because speed will happen naturally as you become more practiced, but accuracy won't; so get that first. “Too far too fast” makes Jack an inaccurate boy.

An instant way to experience multipurpose networks if you don't play guitar:

Dudes, do you consider that your peripheral nervous system (supplying blood to your muscles, bones and skin) is a separate network from your imagination?

If you do, you can probably see that an imagination exercise can still affect your PNS. If you can't see that, think about sex real hard for a while and see if it affects your peripheral nervous system in any way  :  )

Okay, you may think that imagination and getting a sexual response are not 'unrelated tasks', but from the brain's pov no task is 'unrelated' or out on its own.

These networks improve as they do because the taske ARE related. The mind relates sertain abstract tasks to certain concrete tasks because they use the same networks. If you do this experiment in an MRI you'll see that the nets employed by imagination to think horny thoughts include the same sensorimotor nets that would be active if you were actually having sex. Your body doesn't respond because you're having sex, it responds because it believes that you're about to, because the same networks are being fired up. Tasks using the same networks are NOT unrelated; that's the reason it works.
Best,
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting

Board Info

User Info:   Newest User :  sailing 1   Members Online: 0   Guests Online: 502
Topic
Nouveau/nouvelle
Locked
Topic
Nouveau/nouvelle
Locked
Sticky
Active
New/Active
Sticky
Active
New/Active
New/Closed
New Sticky
Closed/Active
New/Locked
New Sticky
Locked/Active
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky Active Locked
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky/Active/Locked