English (United Kingdom)French (Fr)Russian (CIS)Espa
Home Forum Neurohacking The Lab What is love.. no play..

Connexion

Pour acc

empathia
useravatar
User Info

What is love.. no play..

We had a lecturer that said that to it is important to have both fun and discipline to progress spiritually.

What do you Alex say about this? Do fun and discipline go together and if they do, how exactly? When I've had too much kundalini yoga, I will go into this listless state where I just stare into space for hours and then I may start reading something but not do anything really active. My main focus just seems to be to let me be in this space. And there is a tendency to want to come out of this space.. maybe getting back to this space again and again is fun & discipline because it does feel good if I let my self go (there).



Edited By:  empathia
Oct-29-11 17:40:10

Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

Hi dude,

It depends on how this lecturer defines “fun”, “discipline”, “progress” and “spiritually”; and how you personally define them. There are many many different definitions of each of these terms. Some people fnd discipline fun, for example, which makes it difficult for them NOT to have both at the same time.

We have to understand exactly what people mean before deciding whether we agree. We can never assume other people mean the same as we do, because everyone's associations are different; you, me, the dude in the all night garage, the dalai lama, we all have our own personal ideas of what is fun... If 'fun' had some measurable scale like 'serotonin release', then I'd be able to answer.

I'm not really in any position to judge 'spiritual progress' in any case! I do know that we need both sponteneity and control, both N5 and N4, to fully develop intelligence, just as we need both strength and endurance, both noradrenaline and acetylcholine...but that's not at all the same thing as spiritual development (by my definition) so maybe not helpful...?
Best,
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting
empathia
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

My main point was that if one is playing, isn't playing so internally rewarding that discipline comes naturally? Or have I misinterpreted something in the theory? He doesn't have a theory on play so I don't have a reason to care much about what he thinks play or discipline is.

OH now I think I got it.. It is possible to get carried away with the fun.. and then forget to look deeper inside.. maybe that's control?


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

Yes, spot on  :  )

With regard to play I couldn't agree more. With regard to discipline,* we've all seen young animals and children get over-excited and end up falling ass-first into or over something, then bitterly complaining about it  :  ) Discipline is putting the brakes on. Controlling your own hormones & neurochemistry in ways that enable you to calm it down or slow things down when necessary, and being able to focus.

'Discipline' in NH terms is focus, order and self control, as in 'order out of chaos'. We have to be able to focus and ignore distractions, if we get too caught up in too many things it becomes confusing, health suffers and perception gets cloudy. On the other hand if there is not enough new stuff to play with, it becomes boring, health suffers and perception gets cloudy. The green zone is always in the middle.

I guess its like saying we need an accelerator AND a brake  :  )
The 'accelerator' is modulated by norepinephrine, the 'brake' is modulated by acetylcholine.
...So eating eggs helps discipline? Theoretically it should. If you like eggs, feel free to try the experiment!
Best,
AR
*(not 'discipline' as in "Hot Helga's FunHouse of Correction")


Administrator has disabled public posting
Fractal
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

" *(not 'discipline' as in "Hot Helga's FunHouse of Correction") "

lol, so which neurotransmitters are involved in BDSM?


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

Fractal Wrote:
lol, so which neurotransmitters are involved in BDSM?

S/M folks have exactly the same transmitters all of us do. Input preference (no pun intended) is literally a matter of association -whatever blows your hair back, man.  Some of us get our dopamine hit from fondling breasts or penises, some from dressing up as batman or wearing handcuffs or eating yogurt off each other, but obviously not all of us do. It's exactly the same as some of us liking certain foods that others find repulsive.

Some prefer an endorphin-laced high, others prefer a long period of dopamine, others like a lot of oxytocin with their sex, others want a fast acetylcholine hit, and we engage in different activities accordingly. The details don't matter to biology, it will happily adapt to get erotically excited or hungry over pretty much anything if the associations are right. Even household electrical appliances can give some people a double polaroid*

The basics remain the same. Everybody needs dopamine and noradrenaline to want sex and acetylcholine to have an orgasm in the same way everybody needs hydrochloric acid to digest their food.

When the opportunity for willing sex arises, regardless of what details our individual conscious minds decide is sexy, unconscious biology thinks, “Fuck the details; let's dance”.
Best,
AR

*Reference: See: Red Dwarf/DNA


Administrator has disabled public posting
Fractal
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

Alex wrote:


Input preference (no pun intended) is literally a matter of association -whatever blows your hair back, man.  Some of us get our dopamine hit from fondling breasts or penises, some from dressing up as batman or wearing handcuffs or eating yogurt off each other, but obviously not all of us do. It's exactly the same as some of us liking certain foods that others find repulsive.

Some prefer an endorphin-laced high, others prefer a long period of dopamine, others like a lot of oxytocin with their sex, others want a fast acetylcholine hit, and we engage in different activities accordingly. The details don't matter to biology, it will happily adapt to get erotically excited or hungry over pretty much anything if the associations are right. Even household electrical appliances can give some people a double polaroid*

The basics remain the same. Everybody needs dopamine and noradrenaline to want sex and acetylcholine to have an orgasm in the same way everybody needs hydrochloric acid to digest their food.

When the opportunity for willing sex arises, regardless of what details our individual conscious minds decide is sexy, unconscious biology thinks, “Fuck the details; let's dance”.
Best,
AR

*Reference: See: Red Dwarf/DNA
Hmm, I assumed that input preference - which sounds like a pun to me! - is partially hard-wired (by genetics or hormones), and partially associatively learned, although its difficult to know what the ratio is. So maybe S&M people have higher sensitivity to endorphins? Or maybe its partially that they are more open minded and willing to experiment?

Dopamine and noradrenaline are not surprising - thus coke-fuelled orgies. Acetylcholine is a bit more surprising, as its involved with memory and so some people take acetylcholine precursors as nootropics - not that there is any reason why the same neurotransmitter would not be used in these different situations, I think 'learning' has too many associations in my mind with 'intellectual learning', 'serious business' and so forth, so the same neurotransmitter being involved in learning and orgasm amuses me. Of course, learning to dance for instance is still learning, despite not being 'intellectual learning'. Basically a healthy mind is healthy in all respects.


Administrator has disabled public posting
Alex
useravatar
User Info

Re: What is love.. no play..

Hi dudes,

Some input preference is hard wired, for example initially we prefer quiet sounds to loud sounds, soft warm furry things to hard cold things. But most input preference parameters are (or rather should be) calibrated at birth. We're looking for signals for every sense, to first boot the systems up and then calibrate them. The examples we are given are taken as the baseline defaults. Those are our basics. From thereon in we compare everything against those and assume it will have enough points of similarity to make sense.

Biology is expecting particular inputs; for sound, a human heartbeat; for taste, human breast milk; for sight, a human face, for touch, human skin and for smell, healthy human. If these signals aren't given, the systems don't boot up or calibrate accurately and our 'tastes' are no longer set to be optimal for our wellbeing. (We can set them up again later, so no worries)  :  )

The basics are hardwired: we are preprogrammed to communicate, but we must hear language if we're to communicate in language. The details (which particular language) are not hardwired; a kid raised by wolves will happily adapt to communicating in wuffs, howls and barks, but the intent to communicate is hardwired and will not go away.

All main neurotransmitters are involved with memory; not just ACh. I take ACh receptor triggers as nootropics, but for clarity & focus; not memory.

I, too, had a thing about the 'learning' term bcause of bad experience in school. Try replacing the concept with 'playing' or 'exploring', because really all natural learning is this.
Because there are a limited number of NTs, many are going to be involved in diverse activities that don't themselves seem related.

...Or are they? Someone needs to do the experiment of using an orgasm as a method of weighting important information and see if they remember it any better...if it works, exams of the future could be very noisy and held in private booths...
Best,
AR


Administrator has disabled public posting

Board Info

User Info:   Newest User :  sailing 1   Members Online: 0   Guests Online: 742
Topic
Nouveau/nouvelle
Locked
Topic
Nouveau/nouvelle
Locked
Sticky
Active
New/Active
Sticky
Active
New/Active
New/Closed
New Sticky
Closed/Active
New/Locked
New Sticky
Locked/Active
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky Active Locked
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky/Active/Locked